Monte Joy Preservation
Howard County
A countywide historic preservation organization
Council Resolution 5-2001
T he 2000 General Plan included a Historic Preservation policy/action called "Development Impacts." This action called for the adoption "of a list of properties from the Historic Sites Inventory that have additional development potential and should be subject to the historic sites guidelines of the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations."

PHC was pleased to partner with Planning and Zoning to create this list. Targeting the first 500 sites on the Historic Sites Inventory, more than one dozen volunteers extracted data from the Maryland State Tax records, trekked throughout the County to find and identify the sites listed on the Historic Inventory, photographed the sites, compiled the data, and created a final report detailing the 120 sites listed in Council Resolution 5-2001.
"Don't ever doubt that a small group of committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is all that ever does."
- Margaret Meade

On March 5, the County Council voted 3-1 in favor of Council Resolution 5-2001. Councilman Mary Lorsung, who was absent, also supported the Resolution. Councilmen Guy Guzzone, Vernon Gray, and Allan Kittleman voted for the Resolution, while Councilman Chris Merdon voted against - citing constituent complaints and concern about potentially more restrictive guidelines in the future.

With the passage of CR-2001, the 120 sites in the list will now be subject to existing subdivision guidelines that seek to preserve the integrity of the historical sites when these sites enter the subdivision process.

There was a large turnout at the public hearing on January 16. Vision: Howard County, The Howard County Historical Society, and Preservation Howard County spoke in favor of the Resolution. Several property owners on the list also spoke in favor of the resolution or asked questions about the process. Four property owners spoke against the Resolution, citing fears that their property rights might be restricted by the new guidelines.

The Council studied the Resolution at the January 23 work session and tabled the Resolution at the February 5 Council Meeting.

PHC thanks the volunteers who helped with this important initiative. It is an excellent example of how a non-profit can work in partnership with the County towards a mutually agreeable goal.

The next steps are to identify sites from the remainder of the Historic Sites Inventory, revise and update the existing Inventory - including adding additional historic properties, and begin work with the County on the next General Plan initiative: drafting a countywide Historic Preservation Plan.